Most advisors spend decades growing a practice worth millions — and retire with zero enterprise value to show for it. There's a different structure. This page explains it.
Most advisors don't see the full picture until they step back from it. These are the six structural features of the traditional advisor model that compound against you over time.
A direct comparison of the traditional advisor model vs. Kathmere Capital Management — across the dimensions that matter most for a serious practice.
| Dimension | Traditional Model | Kathmere Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership | $0 enterprise value at retirement | Real equity stake with enterprise value you can monetize |
| Growth Partnership | No upfront capital at transition | 3× cash + 0.5× equity at close for a 10% non-controlling stake |
| Platform | Firm-selected, approval required | Open architecture — public, private, custom indexing, full access |
| Fiduciary | Suitability / dual registration | SEC-registered RIA — fiduciary standard, always |
| Custodian | Proprietary / firm-controlled | Charles Schwab — independent, advisor-friendly |
| Succession | Firm controls transition terms | Built into partnership structure — your terms, your timeline |
| Capital Partner | None — you share upside with the firm | Merchant Wealth Partners — $174B ecosystem, 15–20× EBITDA exit path |
A transition to Kathmere is not a disruption — it's a structured handoff, planned months in advance, executed over days. Our onboarding team, legal partners, and the Schwab Advisor Transition Team work in parallel so your clients experience continuity from Day 1.
Talk to Nick Directly →This isn't a pitch. It's a conversation between peers about what's possible for a practice like yours. Nick Olesen is a Co-Founder of Kathmere — not a recruiter, not a sales rep. Someone who built what you'd be joining.
All information is held in strict confidence. We will never contact your current employer or share your information with any third party.